HarrisonDreves@gmail.com | (615)-349-7300
  Harrison Dreves
  • Home
  • Resume
  • Videography
  • Writing
  • Graphics
  • Blog

A Conversation with Chris Clack: Why the Electric Grid Needs to Get Bigger

10/30/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
Chris Clack is a mathematician who builds models to study our electrical system. In January 2016, while working as NOAA researcher, he co-authored a paper that used various models to show that the United States could reduce carbon emissions from electricity generation by 80 percent by 2030, using only existing technologies (and at slightly lower cost). Clack, who lives in Boulder, Colorado, has since founded his own company, which builds models for various clients in the energy sector, including governments, utilities and grid operators.
​
This is an edited version of a conversation with Clack on Oct. 25, 2016.

Harrison Dreves: Could you summarize the findings the paper you co-authored in Nature Climate Change?

Chris Clack: In really simple terms, the lowest cost electricity option for the U.S., with today's technology, is 80 percent carbon free generation. A lot of people that read the paper assume we wanted 80 percent renewables. We actually asked 'what is the lowest cost system?' and then what falls out from that is a national transmission system with lower cost electricity.


Read More
0 Comments

IN BRIEF: "The Great Dying" may not have been as bad as we think

10/7/2016

0 Comments

 
(But still pretty bad!)

The Permian-Triassic extinction event (a.k.a. "The Great Dying") occurred 252 million years ago and is generally considered the largest mass extinction event in Earth's history. By comparing the diversity of fossilized life from before and after the extinction event, the geologic research community has estimated that 90-96% of all species went extinct during a 60,000 year period (plus or minus 50,000 years). The Permian extinction is believed to have been especially severe in the planet's oceans.

However, a new paper, published by Steven Stanley from the University of Hawaii in The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, challenges this traditional understanding. Stanley, using no new data but instead a different mathematical method to calculate extinction rates, argues that the Permian extinction may have only wiped out about 81% of all species on Earth.

His new argument centers on background extinction rates–the amount of species going extinct on a regular basis, even when no major extinction event is underway. Stanley calculates the background extinction rate for the middle and late Permian geologic era and then subtracts that from the extinction rates of the Permian extinction event. He also makes several other mathematical adjustments, but, essentially, he's discounting species that likely went extinct before the Permian extinction or that would have gone extinct during that time period, even if not major extinction event were happening.

With these calculations, the new rate of extinction during the Permian-Triassic extinction event is approximately 81% of all species. This is still a drastic reduction in biodiversity on Earth, but not as severe as previously thought.

Stanley's idea is certainly new and controversial within the geologic community. It will take time to see how the scientific consensus on "The Great Dying" evolves.
0 Comments
    Tweets by @hdboomy

    Categories

    All
    Digital Media
    In Brief
    Report
    Thoughts

    Archives

    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013

    RSS Feed

Contact: HarrisonDreves@gmail.com | (615)-349-7300