HarrisonDreves@gmail.com | (615)-349-7300
  Harrison Dreves
  • Home
  • Resume
  • Videography
  • Writing
  • Graphics
  • Blog

THOUGHTS:  Thinking by Orders of Magnitude

9/23/2013

0 Comments

 
Early in my last year of university, my most energetic geology professor asked his class to give the rate of drift for Earth’s tectonic plates. The other students and I – exercising the habits of memorization that come from three years of education in the natural sciences – looked to the ceiling or floor and began to recall previous classes. Did he want the faster drift rates of the Pacific plate (7-12 cm/year) or the slower rates of the North American plate (2-4 cm/year)? The Antarctic plate hardly moves at all. . .

The professor waved his arms enthusiastically and told us to stop thinking. “Orders of magnitude only!” he explained. “Let’s call it 1 cm/year. What about rates of mountain uplift in active regions, like the Himalayas and New Zealand?” The answer, to an order of magnitude, was 0.1 cm/year.

Now his point was obvious: plates drift faster than mountains rise, but both move at similar speeds.  This relationship – normally hidden behind numbers like 7.3 and 0.4 – was suddenly clear in the comparison of 1 and 0.1.  We had lost some precision, but had gained clarity, which we would easily remember.

An order of magnitude is a group of measurements (all of the same type) that fall within one power of ten. So 2 and 7 are the same order of magnitude, but 12 is one order of magnitude greater and 70,000 is four greater. Each could be approximated as 100, 100, 101, and 104, respectively. This simplicity makes orders of magnitude excellent for quickly comparing very large (and very small) numbers.

Picture
Comic by Randall Munroe, creator of xkcd.com.

Read More
0 Comments

REPORT: On the Increasing Complexity of Scientific Research

9/10/2013

0 Comments

 
The James Webb Space Telescope
Credit: NASA
The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is a wonder of human engineering.  Its primary mirror – a collection of smaller mirrors – is 6.5 meters wide.  To operate, JWST’s mirror and sensors must be chilled to within 50 degrees Kelvin of absolute zero (-370ºF), with one instrument operating at only 7 Kelvin.  To help achieve these temperatures, it will be shielded by a sunshade the size of a tennis court.  To fit JWST into the top of an Ariane rocket for launch, the whole spacecraft (tennis court included) will be folded into a space only 4.5 meters in diameter.  Once the telescope leaves Earth orbit for its final destination, orbiting the Sun 1.5 million miles outside of Earth’s orbit, it will unfold and begin observing.

JWST will be capable of imaging an incredible array of targets. Peering across the Universe – and thus back in time – it will observe the formation of the first galaxies, only 250 million years after the Big Bang. It will be able to detect the presence of planets around other stars and search for water in their atmosphere (a step toward finding potential homes for life). It will even give us more detailed views of the outer planets in our own solar system.  But there is another side to JWST. . .

Read More
0 Comments

In Brief: Epigenetics

8/22/2013

0 Comments

 
Histones & DNA
If genetics is the official language of life, epigenetics is the vernacular: knowing which words to use in a situation, how often to use them, and which words to leave out entirely.


Slightly less in brief:
The genome – the DNA that holds all the instructions for building an organism – doesn’t actually do anything.  Proteins do most of the work in a cell.  Proteins of all shapes and sizes, along with a few other types of molecule, are the cellular machinery. 

The genome is just a blueprint for this machinery.  Many short sections of the genome – the genes – describe how to build proteins.  Certain proteins read genes and make temporary copies, which other bits of cellular machinery then use to build new proteins.

So which genes get read?


Read More
0 Comments

REPORT: What just happened in the newspaper industry?

8/11/2013

2 Comments

 
Last week, two of the remaining, high-profile American newspapers--the Boston Globe and Washington Post--were sold to new owners.  The Washington Post passed from family ownership to Jeffrey Bezos, founder of Amazon.com, while, in an almost reverse sale, The Boston Globe was sold by The New York Times Company to John Henry, a Boston local and owner of the Red Sox.  Meanwhile, the same New York Times Company, largely family-owned, issued a public assurance that the New York Times will not be sold. 

These are three very different paths for three major journalistic outlets. Do we see any evidence for these paths in their readership numbers?  


Read More
2 Comments
Forward>>
    Tweets by @hdboomy

    Categories

    All
    Digital Media
    In Brief
    Report
    Thoughts

    Archives

    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013

    RSS Feed

Contact: HarrisonDreves@gmail.com | (615)-349-7300